Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Michael S. Atkinson's avatar

Note to self: add The Wire, She-Ra, and the Expanse to my to-watch queue asap.

The only reason I wouldn't dive right into the Expanse is that I'd wonder whether I should read the novels first and then the show, or after, or alongside, or if it even matters; I tend to be a purist about these things (I'm probably the only LOTR fan in North America who loves the books and dislikes the Peter Jackson movies) but there are some movies that improve on the source material, or at least enhance it (i.e., the Godfather.)

Mike Miller's avatar

Note: watch The Wire and She-Ra.

Of COURSE Apollo 13 is the high water mark for space realism. It's historical, not sci-fi.

Saw that with a friend who didn't know it was a true story AND overlooked the "based on a book by Jim Lovell" credit at the beginning. Thus, she had no idea how it ended. She was clutching my arm so hard during re-entry I had bruises. There are two shots I want to remove where, in my opinion, Howard went too far into style over storytelling and snapped me out of my suspension of disbelief*. Otherwise, Apollo 13 remains the most perfect movie I've ever seen.

*During the launch all the carefully recreated news footage has me in awe of the power of the Saturn V... Then there's that overhead after it's cleared the pad where the Saturn V goes right by the virtual camera and the exhaust whites out the frame. This breaks the documentary feel for a cool, but impossible shot.

The second is that stupid fast tracking shot over Apollo 13's electronics to the sparking boards just before the blowout. Again, this is an "impossible" shot which breaks the grounded, documentary feel of the rest of the film. For storytelling purposes this could have been static.

Both shots CALL ATTENTION to themselves as VFX.

7 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?